The LinkedIn Playbook Behind 27 New Clients in 90 Days

Where this comes from

We studied 35 of the most successful client-getters on LinkedIn, the people turning posts into booked calls, to find what they actually did and what they had in common. These are their numbers, not ours. A few of them:

Every one of them ran a system. Here it is.

Five mechanics that decide whether anyone sees your post

This is where most "I tried LinkedIn and it didn't work" consultants lost. Their ideas were fine. They lost on the five things below.

1. 1

   Write the hook last.

   Your first line has one job: earn the second line. Most people pour their energy into the body and bolt a warm-up sentence on top. Backwards. Write the whole post first, then hunt for the most surprising sentence in it (usually buried in the middle, the admission or the number or the line that made you slightly nervous to type), cut it, and move it to the top. A good hook lands cold, with zero context. "I lost a $400K client over a typo" works. "Some thoughts on client communication" does not.

2. 2

   Keep links out of the post.

   LinkedIn quietly buries posts that try to send people off the platform. The best creators know this, so they post clean and drop the link in the first comment instead, with a "link in the comments" at the end of the post. Costs you nothing, and it protects your reach.

3. 3

   The first 90 minutes decide everything.

   The algorithm shows every post to a small group first. Engage fast and it goes wide. Stay quiet and it dies. So post when your buyers are actually awake (Tuesday to Thursday, 7 to 9am their time, for most consulting audiences), then stay for an hour and reply to every comment the moment it lands. Posting and walking away is how good posts die at 200 views.

4. 4

   Comments are worth more than likes.

   A like is a nod. A comment is a conversation, and conversations turn into calls. The algorithm rewards them far more heavily too. So build the post to provoke one: end on a real question, or a take people will want to argue with. Agreeable posts get scrolled past.

5. 5

   Write for a thumb.

   Your reader is on a phone, in a queue, half paying attention. One idea per post. Short lines. A blank line between them. Nothing longer than two lines in a row. A wall of text is a signal to scroll, and the algorithm watches how fast they do.

What to post, and how often

Knowing the mechanics isn't the same as knowing what to say. Here's a mix that holds up on both LinkedIn and X, week after week.

• Authority, 50%. Specific insights, frameworks, and hard-won lessons from the actual work. This is what makes someone trust you with their problem.
• Personal, 25%. A real story with a business lesson, or why you do this work. Trust is built here, more than anywhere else.
• Build in public, 15%. What you're working on, what's landing, what isn't. An ongoing story people come back to follow.
• Offers, 10%. A direct ask: a client result, open capacity, what you sell. You earn this slice with the other 90%.

How often: three to five posts a week, every week. Consistency beats volume. A steady three a week for six months will out-earn ten in a launch week followed by silence. Pick a cadence you can hold when client work gets heavy, because that's the only test that counts.

Fix your profile before you post anything

Every post you write sends curious people to one place: your profile. Most consultants' profiles read like a CV, and a CV converts nobody. Three fixes, fifteen minutes.

• →

  Headline. Skip the job title. Use a plain sentence: who you help, and what changes for them.

• →

  About. First line says who you help and the outcome. Last line tells them the one thing to do next: book a call, send a DM, grab the guide.

• →

  Featured. One clear next step pinned at the top. Not a graveyard of old articles.

Make your AI sound like you, not a robot

Paste your posts into ChatGPT or Claude and the output sounds like a machine wrote it. The clients you're trying to win can tell. And LinkedIn's 2026 algorithm now limits the reach of anything that reads like generic AI.

The file below fixes that: writing rules, banned AI phrases, and formatting, all pre-loaded. Paste samples of your own writing into the section at the bottom, and the model matches your voice instead of its own. Use pre-AI writing for the samples (old proposals, emails, memos). That's what makes it sound like you.

# Voice DNA

## Writing Rules
- Write like a sharp human, not a language model.
- Use contractions naturally (don't, can't, won't).
- Short paragraphs. 1-3 sentences max.
- Get to the point. No throat-clearing, no preamble.
- If making a claim, be specific. Use numbers, names, concrete details.
- Vary sentence length. Mix short punchy lines with longer ones.
- Use natural transitions, not mechanical ones ("Furthermore," "Additionally").
- When uncertain, say so plainly ("I think," "probably," "kinda"). Hedging is human.
- Never pad output to seem more thorough. Shorter and accurate beats longer and fluffy.
- Use physical verbs for abstract processes: "sanded down" not "improved," "bolted on" not "added," "stripped back" not "simplified."
- Humor comes from specificity, not from jokes. Be unexpectedly precise.
- Parenthetical asides are good. Use them for editorial commentary, honest reactions, quick tangents, and deflating your own seriousness (like this).

## Formatting Rules
- Short paragraphs (1-2 sentences default, 3 max).
- Numbers as digits.
- Contractions always.
- NO em dashes ever. Use commas, periods, colons, semicolons, or parentheses.
- Bold sparingly, 1-2 key moments per section.
- Code blocks for specific prompts, commands, or tool outputs.

## Banned Phrases (never use these, ever)

### Dead AI Language
- "In today's [anything]..."
- "It's important to note that..." / "It's worth noting..."
- "Delve" / "Dive into" / "Unpack"
- "Harness" / "Leverage" / "Utilize"
- "Landscape" / "Realm" / "Robust"
- "Game-changer" / "Cutting-edge"
- "Straightforward"
- "I'd be happy to help"
- "In order to"

### Dead Transitions
- "Furthermore" / "Additionally" / "Moreover"
- "Moving forward" / "At the end of the day"
- "To put this in perspective..."
- "What makes this particularly interesting is..."
- "The implications here are..."
- "In other words..."
- "It goes without saying..."

### Engagement Bait
- "Let that sink in" / "Read that again" / "Full stop"
- "This changes everything"
- "Are you paying attention?"
- "You're not ready for this"

### AI Cringe
- "Supercharge" / "Unlock" / "Future-proof"
- "10x your productivity"
- "The AI revolution"
- "In the age of AI"

### Generic Insider Claims
- "Here's the part nobody's talking about"
- "What nobody tells you"
- Anything with "nobody" or "most people don't realize"

### The Big One (FATAL)
- "This isn't X. This is Y." and ALL variations.
- "Not X. Y."
- "Forget X. This is Y."
- "Less X, more Y."
- ANY sentence that negates one framing then asserts a corrected one.
- If even ONE of these appears, the output fails. Delete the negation, just state the positive claim.

## Writing Samples

[Paste your writing here. The more you give, the better the voice match.]

10 minutes of setup. The output goes from "fine" to "wait, did I write this?"

The catch, and the fix

None of this is hard to understand. It's hard to keep doing. Four sharp posts a week is a part-time job, and it's the first thing that drops when client work gets busy. That's why most consultants go quiet by week five.

EVY removes the writing. You talk for a few minutes about your week, and it comes back as posts built on the playbook above, in your voice, not generic AI. The system stays the same. The grind disappears.

And on the days you've got nothing to say, EVY hands you three content ideas every morning, drawn from your work and your field. The blank page stops being a problem.