EVY

LinkedIn Playbook · For Consultants & Independents

The LinkedIn Playbook Behind 27 New Clients in 90 Days

The exact moves consultants and independent operators use to turn LinkedIn into a client pipeline. Take all of it.

EVY · 6 min read · Includes a free Voice DNA file

Most consultants and independent operators treat LinkedIn like a CV that posts once a quarter. A few treat it like pipeline, and the gap between them comes down to a handful of moves almost nobody gets right.

Where this comes from

We studied 35 of the most successful client-getters on LinkedIn, the people turning posts into booked calls, to find what they actually did and what they had in common. These are their numbers, not ours. A few of them:

27

new clients and $153K in new monthly recurring revenue, in 90 days (@MichLieben).

50+

calls a month and a $60K/month practice, all sourced from LinkedIn, for one solo consultant (@LoganTGott). Multiple $10K deals off those calls.

$320K

in direct revenue over 63 weeks, from just 14K followers, for an agency founder (@alexgroberman).

Every one of them ran a system. Here it is.

Five mechanics that decide whether anyone sees your post

This is where most "I tried LinkedIn and it didn't work" consultants lost. Their ideas were fine. They lost on the five things below.

  1. 1

    Write the hook last.

    Your first line has one job: earn the second line. Most people pour their energy into the body and bolt a warm-up sentence on top. Backwards. Write the whole post first, then hunt for the most surprising sentence in it (usually buried in the middle, the admission or the number or the line that made you slightly nervous to type), cut it, and move it to the top. A good hook lands cold, with zero context. "I lost a $400K client over a typo" works. "Some thoughts on client communication" does not.

  2. 2

    Keep links out of the post.

    LinkedIn quietly buries posts that try to send people off the platform. The best creators know this, so they post clean and drop the link in the first comment instead, with a "link in the comments" at the end of the post. Costs you nothing, and it protects your reach.

  3. 3

    The first 90 minutes decide everything.

    The algorithm shows every post to a small group first. Engage fast and it goes wide. Stay quiet and it dies. So post when your buyers are actually awake (Tuesday to Thursday, 7 to 9am their time, for most consulting audiences), then stay for an hour and reply to every comment the moment it lands. Posting and walking away is how good posts die at 200 views.

  4. 4

    Comments are worth more than likes.

    A like is a nod. A comment is a conversation, and conversations turn into calls. The algorithm rewards them far more heavily too. So build the post to provoke one: end on a real question, or a take people will want to argue with. Agreeable posts get scrolled past.

  5. 5

    Write for a thumb.

    Your reader is on a phone, in a queue, half paying attention. One idea per post. Short lines. A blank line between them. Nothing longer than two lines in a row. A wall of text is a signal to scroll, and the algorithm watches how fast they do.

What to post, and how often

Knowing the mechanics isn't the same as knowing what to say. Here's a mix that holds up on both LinkedIn and X, week after week.

  • Authority, 50%. Specific insights, frameworks, and hard-won lessons from the actual work. This is what makes someone trust you with their problem.
  • Personal, 25%. A real story with a business lesson, or why you do this work. Trust is built here, more than anywhere else.
  • Build in public, 15%. What you're working on, what's landing, what isn't. An ongoing story people come back to follow.
  • Offers, 10%. A direct ask: a client result, open capacity, what you sell. You earn this slice with the other 90%.

How often: three to five posts a week, every week. Consistency beats volume. A steady three a week for six months will out-earn ten in a launch week followed by silence. Pick a cadence you can hold when client work gets heavy, because that's the only test that counts.

Fix your profile before you post anything

Every post you write sends curious people to one place: your profile. Most consultants' profiles read like a CV, and a CV converts nobody. Three fixes, fifteen minutes.

Before

Managing Partner at Meridian Advisory

After

I help B2B founders fix their pricing and win bigger deals · 40+ pricing projects · ex-McKinsey

  • Headline. Skip the job title. Use a plain sentence: who you help, and what changes for them.

  • About. First line says who you help and the outcome. Last line tells them the one thing to do next: book a call, send a DM, grab the guide.

  • Featured. One clear next step pinned at the top. Not a graveyard of old articles.

Turn the reads into a client list

Reach doesn't pay rent. Once a month, turn one post into a straight trade: something worth having, for a way to reach that person again, somewhere an algorithm can't bury you overnight.

  • The offer. A teardown, a checklist, a benchmark. Free, and good enough that someone would have paid for it.

  • The trigger. End the post with "comment the word and I'll send it." Lower bar than a cold DM, and it doubles as a public vote of interest.

  • The capture. Send it back by DM, then offer it by email too. That's a list of your own. No algorithm stands between you and it.

One good lead-magnet post can out-convert a month of likes.

Make your AI sound like you, not a robot

Paste your posts into ChatGPT or Claude and the output sounds like a machine wrote it. The clients you're trying to win can tell. And LinkedIn's 2026 algorithm now limits the reach of anything that reads like generic AI.

The file below fixes that: writing rules, banned AI phrases, and formatting, all pre-loaded. Paste samples of your own writing into the section at the bottom, and the model matches your voice instead of its own. Use pre-AI writing for the samples (old proposals, emails, memos). That's what makes it sound like you.

voice-dna.md
# Voice DNA

## Writing Rules
- Write like a sharp human, not a language model.
- Use contractions naturally (don't, can't, won't).
- Short paragraphs. 1-3 sentences max.
- Get to the point. No throat-clearing, no preamble.
- If making a claim, be specific. Use numbers, names, concrete details.
- Vary sentence length. Mix short punchy lines with longer ones.
- Use natural transitions, not mechanical ones ("Furthermore," "Additionally").
- When uncertain, say so plainly ("I think," "probably," "kinda"). Hedging is human.
- Never pad output to seem more thorough. Shorter and accurate beats longer and fluffy.
- Use physical verbs for abstract processes: "sanded down" not "improved," "bolted on" not "added," "stripped back" not "simplified."
- Humor comes from specificity, not from jokes. Be unexpectedly precise.
- Parenthetical asides are good. Use them for editorial commentary, honest reactions, quick tangents, and deflating your own seriousness (like this).

## Formatting Rules
- Short paragraphs (1-2 sentences default, 3 max).
- Numbers as digits.
- Contractions always.
- NO em dashes ever. Use commas, periods, colons, semicolons, or parentheses.
- Bold sparingly, 1-2 key moments per section.
- Code blocks for specific prompts, commands, or tool outputs.

## Banned Phrases (never use these, ever)

### Dead AI Language
- "In today's [anything]..."
- "It's important to note that..." / "It's worth noting..."
- "Delve" / "Dive into" / "Unpack"
- "Harness" / "Leverage" / "Utilize"
- "Landscape" / "Realm" / "Robust"
- "Game-changer" / "Cutting-edge"
- "Straightforward"
- "I'd be happy to help"
- "In order to"

### Dead Transitions
- "Furthermore" / "Additionally" / "Moreover"
- "Moving forward" / "At the end of the day"
- "To put this in perspective..."
- "What makes this particularly interesting is..."
- "The implications here are..."
- "In other words..."
- "It goes without saying..."

### Engagement Bait
- "Let that sink in" / "Read that again" / "Full stop"
- "This changes everything"
- "Are you paying attention?"
- "You're not ready for this"

### AI Cringe
- "Supercharge" / "Unlock" / "Future-proof"
- "10x your productivity"
- "The AI revolution"
- "In the age of AI"

### Generic Insider Claims
- "Here's the part nobody's talking about"
- "What nobody tells you"
- Anything with "nobody" or "most people don't realize"

### The Big One (FATAL)
- "This isn't X. This is Y." and ALL variations.
- "Not X. Y."
- "Forget X. This is Y."
- "Less X, more Y."
- ANY sentence that negates one framing then asserts a corrected one.
- If even ONE of these appears, the output fails. Delete the negation, just state the positive claim.

## Writing Samples

[Paste your writing here. The more you give, the better the voice match.]

10 minutes of setup. The output goes from "fine" to "wait, did I write this?"

The catch, and the fix

None of this is hard to understand. Sticking with it is. Four sharp posts a week is a part-time job, the first thing to slip once client work picks up.

EVY removes the writing. Talk for a few minutes, get it back in your voice, built on the playbook above. Some days you've got nothing? Three ideas land every morning, straight from your work.

We'll build your first week. Free.

Each month we hand-pick a small group and build their first week of posts. One 15-minute call on your voice and niche. A full week lands in your inbox days later, built on the playbook above.

Claim your free week →

We only take a handful each month, so every week stays genuinely hands-on.

Frequently asked questions

How do consultants actually get clients from LinkedIn?

Not from going viral. The consultants who win clients on LinkedIn run a system: a profile built like a landing page, a consistent posting cadence (three to five times a week), and posts engineered around how the feed actually works. Engagement in the first 90 minutes decides reach, comments matter more than likes, and links belong in the first comment instead of the post. Do those consistently and LinkedIn becomes a steady source of inbound calls.

How often should a consultant post on LinkedIn?

Three to five times a week, consistently, beats a burst of daily posts followed by a month of silence. Consistency is what the algorithm and your audience both reward. The hard part isn't the cadence, it's sustaining it on top of a full client load, which is where most consultants drop off around week five.

Why do most consultants fail at LinkedIn?

Time, not ideas. Writing three or four sharp posts a week is effectively a part-time job, and it's the first thing dropped when a client deadline lands. A week off becomes a month, momentum resets, and the presence dies. The fix is to stop starting from a blank page and instead turn material you already have (calls, client work, your own thinking) into posts.

How do I stop my AI-written LinkedIn posts from sounding like AI?

Give the model your writing rules and your own voice samples. A 'Voice DNA' file does both: a pre-loaded set of writing rules, banned AI phrases, and formatting constraints, plus a section at the bottom where you paste examples of your own pre-AI writing. The model pattern-matches against your samples, so the output reads like you instead of like a language model. It matters more in 2026 because LinkedIn's algorithm now limits the reach of content that reads like generic AI. There's a free copy of the file on this page.

What's the best time for a consultant to post on LinkedIn?

For most consulting audiences, Tuesday to Thursday between 7 and 9am in your buyers' timezone. The first 90 minutes after posting decide how far it travels, so post when your audience is awake and reply to every comment in that window.